| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181206143002.881189154@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:38:55 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 21/55] drm/meson: Fix OOB memory accesses in meson_viu_set_osd_lut()
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
commit 97b2a3180a559a33852ac0cd77904166069484fd upstream.
Currently on driver bringup with KASAN enabled, meson triggers an OOB
memory access as shown below:
[ 117.904528] ==================================================================
[ 117.904560] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in meson_viu_set_osd_lut+0x7a0/0x890
[ 117.904588] Read of size 4 at addr ffff20000a63ce24 by task systemd-udevd/498
[ 117.904601]
[ 118.083372] CPU: 4 PID: 498 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.20.0-rc3Lyude-Test+ #20
[ 118.091143] Hardware name: amlogic khadas-vim2/khadas-vim2, BIOS 2018.07-rc2-armbian 09/11/2018
[ 118.099768] Call trace:
[ 118.102181] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3e8
[ 118.105796] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[ 118.109083] dump_stack+0x130/0x1c4
[ 118.112539] print_address_description+0x60/0x25c
[ 118.117214] kasan_report+0x1b4/0x368
[ 118.120851] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x18/0x20
[ 118.125566] meson_viu_set_osd_lut+0x7a0/0x890
[ 118.129953] meson_viu_init+0x10c/0x290
[ 118.133741] meson_drv_bind_master+0x474/0x748
[ 118.138141] meson_drv_bind+0x10/0x18
[ 118.141760] try_to_bring_up_master+0x3d8/0x768
[ 118.146249] component_add+0x214/0x570
[ 118.149978] meson_dw_hdmi_probe+0x18/0x20 [meson_dw_hdmi]
[ 118.155404] platform_drv_probe+0x98/0x138
[ 118.159455] really_probe+0x2a0/0xa70
[ 118.163070] driver_probe_device+0x1b4/0x2d8
[ 118.167299] __driver_attach+0x200/0x280
[ 118.171189] bus_for_each_dev+0x10c/0x1a8
[ 118.175144] driver_attach+0x38/0x50
[ 118.178681] bus_add_driver+0x330/0x608
[ 118.182471] driver_register+0x140/0x388
[ 118.186361] __platform_driver_register+0xc8/0x108
[ 118.191117] meson_dw_hdmi_platform_driver_init+0x1c/0x1000 [meson_dw_hdmi]
[ 118.198022] do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x3bc
[ 118.201883] do_init_module+0x1fc/0x638
[ 118.205673] load_module+0x4b4c/0x6808
[ 118.209387] __se_sys_init_module+0x2e8/0x3c0
[ 118.213699] __arm64_sys_init_module+0x68/0x98
[ 118.218100] el0_svc_common+0x104/0x210
[ 118.221893] el0_svc_handler+0x48/0xb8
[ 118.225594] el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[ 118.228429]
[ 118.229887] The buggy address belongs to the variable:
[ 118.235007] eotf_33_linear_mapping+0x84/0xc0
[ 118.239301]
[ 118.240752] Memory state around the buggy address:
[ 118.245522] ffff20000a63cd00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 118.252695] ffff20000a63cd80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 118.259850] >ffff20000a63ce00: 00 00 00 00 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
[ 118.267000] ^
[ 118.271222] ffff20000a63ce80: 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[ 118.278393] ffff20000a63cf00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 fa fa fa
[ 118.285542] ==================================================================
[ 118.292699] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
It seems that when looping through the OSD EOTF LUT maps, we use the
same max iterator for OETF: 20. This is wrong though, since 20*2 is 40,
which means that we'll stop out of bounds on the EOTF maps.
But, this whole thing is already confusing enough to read through as-is,
so let's just replace all of the hardcoded sizes with
OSD_(OETF/EOTF)_LUT_SIZE / 2.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Fixes: bbbe775ec5b5 ("drm: Add support for Amlogic Meson Graphic Controller")
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.10+
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181125012117.31915-1-lyude@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_viu.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_viu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_viu.c
@@ -184,18 +184,18 @@ void meson_viu_set_osd_lut(struct meson_
if (lut_sel == VIU_LUT_OSD_OETF) {
writel(0, priv->io_base + _REG(addr_port));
- for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (OSD_OETF_LUT_SIZE / 2); i++)
writel(r_map[i * 2] | (r_map[i * 2 + 1] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
writel(r_map[OSD_OETF_LUT_SIZE - 1] | (g_map[0] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
- for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (OSD_OETF_LUT_SIZE / 2); i++)
writel(g_map[i * 2 + 1] | (g_map[i * 2 + 2] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
- for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (OSD_OETF_LUT_SIZE / 2); i++)
writel(b_map[i * 2] | (b_map[i * 2 + 1] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
@@ -211,18 +211,18 @@ void meson_viu_set_osd_lut(struct meson_
} else if (lut_sel == VIU_LUT_OSD_EOTF) {
writel(0, priv->io_base + _REG(addr_port));
- for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (OSD_EOTF_LUT_SIZE / 2); i++)
writel(r_map[i * 2] | (r_map[i * 2 + 1] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
writel(r_map[OSD_EOTF_LUT_SIZE - 1] | (g_map[0] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
- for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (OSD_EOTF_LUT_SIZE / 2); i++)
writel(g_map[i * 2 + 1] | (g_map[i * 2 + 2] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
- for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (OSD_EOTF_LUT_SIZE / 2); i++)
writel(b_map[i * 2] | (b_map[i * 2 + 1] << 16),
priv->io_base + _REG(data_port));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists