[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181206143004.231275920@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:39:20 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 46/55] reset: remove remaining WARN_ON() in <linux/reset.h>
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
commit bb6c7768385b200063a14d6615cc1246c3d00760 upstream.
Commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really optional")
gave a new meaning to _get_optional variants.
The differentiation by WARN_ON() is not needed any more. We already
have inconsistency about this; (devm_)reset_control_get_exclusive()
has WARN_ON() check, but of_reset_control_get_exclusive() does not.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/reset.h | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/reset.h
+++ b/include/linux/reset.h
@@ -125,9 +125,6 @@ static inline int device_reset_optional(
static inline struct reset_control *
__must_check reset_control_get_exclusive(struct device *dev, const char *id)
{
-#ifndef CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER
- WARN_ON(1);
-#endif
return __reset_control_get(dev, id, 0, false, false);
}
@@ -273,9 +270,6 @@ static inline struct reset_control *
__must_check devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(struct device *dev,
const char *id)
{
-#ifndef CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER
- WARN_ON(1);
-#endif
return __devm_reset_control_get(dev, id, 0, false, false);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists