linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/ttm: Use pr_debug for all output from ttm_bo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:46:19 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     "Zhang, Jerry(Junwei)" <Jerry.Zhang@....com>,
        "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
        Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
        "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/ttm: Use pr_debug for all output from
 ttm_bo_evict

On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 17:39 +0800, Zhang, Jerry(Junwei) wrote:
> On 12/6/18 5:33 PM, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> > Am 06.12.18 um 10:09 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> > > On 2018-12-06 3:43 a.m., Zhang, Jerry(Junwei) wrote:
> > > > On 12/6/18 12:56 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > All the output is related, so it should all be printed the same way.
> > > > > Some of it was using pr_debug, but some of it appeared in dmesg by
> > > > > default. The caller should handle failure, so there's no need to spam
> > > > > dmesg with potentially quite a lot of output by default.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>
> > > > Sounds reasonable, but personally prefer to show error when some
> > > > vital incident happens, e.g. no memory on eviction.
> > > The amdgpu driver still prints these in that case:
> > > 
> > >    [drm:amdgpu_cs_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* amdgpu_cs_list_validate(validated) failed.
> > >    [drm:amdgpu_cs_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Not enough memory for command submission!

Aren't dump_stack()s already done on all these allocation failures?
I don't notice any use of __GFP_NOWARN on generic allocations in drm.