lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:25:04 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, guroan@...il.com,
        ast@...nel.org, sashal@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 040/123] bpf: allocate local storage buffers
 using GFP_ATOMIC

On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 12:10, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 15:08, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Roman Gushchin <guroan@...il.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 569a933b03f3c48b392fe67c0086b3a6b9306b5a ]
> >
> > Naresh reported an issue with the non-atomic memory allocation of
> > cgroup local storage buffers:
> >
> > [   73.047526] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > /srv/oe/build/tmp-rpb-glibc/work-shared/intel-corei7-64/kernel-source/mm/slab.h:421
> > [   73.060915] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3157, name: test_cgroup_sto
> > [   73.068342] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> > [   73.072293] CPU: 2 PID: 3157 Comm: test_cgroup_sto Not tainted
> > 4.20.0-rc2-next-20181113 #1
> > [   73.080548] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
> > 2.0b 07/27/2017
> > [   73.088018] Call Trace:
> > [   73.090463]  dump_stack+0x70/0xa5
> > [   73.093783]  ___might_sleep+0x152/0x240
> > [   73.097619]  __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
> > [   73.101191]  __kmalloc_node+0x1cf/0x2f0
> > [   73.105031]  ? cgroup_storage_update_elem+0x46/0x90
> > [   73.109909]  cgroup_storage_update_elem+0x46/0x90
> >
> > cgroup_storage_update_elem() (as well as other update map update
> > callbacks) is called with disabled preemption, so GFP_ATOMIC
> > allocation should be used: e.g. alloc_htab_elem() in hashtab.c.
> >
> > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> > Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>
> I have reported above issue on 4.20.0-rc2-next-20181113.
> Now this BUG re-occurring on 4.19.8-rc1 on x86_64 and arm64 devices.

This BUG: was seen on 4.19.1-rc1 also on x86_64 and arm64 devices.

- Naresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ