linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] binder: fix sparse warnings on locking context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:08:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Cc:     "open list:ANDROID DRIVERS" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] binder: fix sparse warnings on locking context

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:37:41AM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:51 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:19:24PM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> > > Add __acquire()/__release() annnotations to fix warnings
> > > in sparse context checking
> > >
> > > There is one case where the warning was due to a lack of
> > > a "default:" case in a switch statement where a lock was
> > > being released in each of the cases, so the default
> > > case was added.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: no change, just resubmitted as #1 of 3 patches instead of by itself
> >
> > I've already applied this one, right?
> 
> No, not yet. I confused you by failing to add the "v2" in the subject
> for the other two submitted with it that you applied this morning:
> 
> binder: filter out nodes when showing binder procs
> binder: fix kerneldoc header for struct binder_buffer
> 
> Sorry about the confusion. This one still needs to be applied.

But I thought I applied this back on November 26:
	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/commit/?h=char-misc-testing&id=324fa64cf4189094bc4df744a9e7214a1b81d845

You should have gotten an email from my scripts at that time.

or is this somehow a different patch with the same commit log?
Or a v2 that changed from the one that I had applied?  Do I need to
revert this one and apply your new one?

confused,

greg k-h