linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: cros_ec: Add commands to control codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181207072307.GF26661@dell>
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 07:23:07 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Cheng-yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
        tzungbi@...omium.org, rohitkr@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: cros_ec: Add commands to control codec

On Thu, 06 Dec 2018, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:34 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2018, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2018, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Lee,
> > > >
> > > > I tried to apply this patch based on
> > > > for-mfd-next branch of mfd tree (
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git )
> > > > Then, I tried to compile all modules by
> > > >
> > > >  ARCH=x86_64 make allyesconfig
> > > >  ARCH=x86_64 make -j64
> > > >
> > > > There was no error.
> > > > Could you please let me know what was the error when you failed to
> > > > apply this patch ?
> > >
> > > Doesn't work for me.
> > >
> > > lee@...t:~/projects/kernel [for-mfd-next]$ formfdnext
> > > Applying: mfd: cros_ec: Add commands to control codec
> > > error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h).
> > > error: could not build fake ancestor
> > > Patch failed at 0001 mfd: cros_ec: Add commands to control codec
> > > Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> > > When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> > > If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> > > To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> >
> > Not that the following lines (as seen in your patch) are not present
> > in the Mainline kernel.
> >
> > > @@ -4077,6 +4077,100 @@ struct __ec_align1 ec_response_i2c_passthru_protect {
> > >       uint8_t status;         /* Status flags (0: unlocked, 1: locked) */
> > >  };
> >
> > Do you have other patches applied to your tree?
> 
> Hi Lee,
> Sorry, I see the problem.
> I was using git am -3 which solves the conflict by itself.

That's what I use, but it still had issues.

Git is probably using a previous resolution in your case.

> I will resend a patch based on your for-mfd-next branch so we can keep
> the patch clean.
> Thanks for your time.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog