[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181207081712.dys7zeh546e2r3wn@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:17:13 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/29] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized usage in
__fpu__restore_sig()
On 2018-12-06 21:07:22 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > @@ -314,41 +312,34 @@ static int __fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
> > * thread's fpu state, reconstruct fxstate from the fsave
> > * header. Validate and sanitize the copied state.
> > */
> > + union fpregs_state *state;
> > + void *tmp;
> > struct user_i387_ia32_struct env;
> > int err = 0;
>
> Sort those in reverse xmas order pls.
>
> Otherwise looks ok.
You mean:
struct user_i387_ia32_struct env;
+ union fpregs_state *state;
+ void *tmp;
int err = 0;
?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists