lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 07 Dec 2018 11:50:21 +0200
From:   Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Minas Harutyunyan <minas.harutyunyan@...opsys.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Minas Harutyunyan <minas.harutyunyan@...opsys.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Maynard CABIENTE <maynard.cabiente@...itan.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc2: Revert "usb: dwc2: Disable all EP's on disconnect"


Hi,


Minas Harutyunyan <minas.harutyunyan@...opsys.com> writes:

> Hi Marek,
>
> On 12/6/2018 7:04 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Dear Minas,
>> 
>> On 2018-12-04 13:34, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2018 6:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>>> Ugh...  We also had a long thread about the v2 patch but it turns out
>>>> the list was not CC'd.  I should have checked for that.
>>>>
>>>> You have to pass a flag to say if the caller holds the lock or not...
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> dan carpenter
>>>>
>>> Hi Dan, Marek, Maynard,
>>>
>>> Could you please apply bellow patch over follow patches:
>>>
>>> dccf1bad4be7 usb: dwc2: Disable all EP's on disconnect
>>> 6f774b501928 usb: dwc2: Fix ep disable spinlock flow.
>>>
>>> Please review and test. Feedback is appreciated :-)
>> 
>> Okay, I finally managed to find some time to check this. Your diff is
>> mangled, so I had to manually apply it. Frankly, it is very similar to
>> the revert I proposed. I've checked it on my test machines and it fixes
>> the issues. I'm not very happy about the unlock/lock design, but it
>> should be safe in this case and doesn't make the code even more complex.
>> Feel free to add a following tag to the final patch:
>> 
>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Thanks for testing.

should $Subject be applied? Can you resend rebased on testing/next with
Tested-by tags collected if you're happy with it?

thanks

-- 
balbi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ