[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed956235-d439-411e-a959-edb356d9fb9f@st.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:56:36 +0100
From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Mark Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [ v3 3/3] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: add manual mode
Hi Linus,
It is correct.
I will replace "manual mode" by "polling mode" in next patchset.
Regards,
Christophe Kerello.
On 12/7/18 10:16 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:42 PM Christophe Kerello
> <christophe.kerello@...com> wrote:
>
>> This patch adds the manual mode, a basic mode that do not need
>> any DMA channels. This mode is also useful for debug purpose.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
>
> This is a bit of drive-by comment, but "manual mode" usually
> means there is a person "a man" pulling levers and pushing
> buttons. There is nothing manual inside a computer system.
>
> I think the more appropriate term is "polling mode" which is
> what we call code that read registers directly waiting for status
> flags rather than relying on IRQs or DMA flows.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists