linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: restore EV_ABS ABS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 15:28:07 +0100
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
        Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...zinger.com>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: restore EV_ABS ABS_RESERVED

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 08:46:05AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 9:36 AM Martin Kepplinger
> > > <martin.kepplinger@...zinger.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 06.12.18 00:03, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > > > ABS_RESERVED was added in d9ca1c990a7 and accidentally removed as part of
> > > > > ffe0e7cf290f5c9 when the high-resolution scrolling code was removed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...zinger.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > Dmitry, I do not think this one will conflict with the high res wheel
> > > patches, so I think it should be safe to take it through your tree.
> > > If you think it'll be an issue, I can also take it through the HID one.
> >
> > fwiw, patch was made on top of v4.20-rc5, so it shouldn't conflict.
>
> My tree is behind that ;) so I would actually prefer if Benjamin/Jiri
> would take it through their tree with my:
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>

OK, thanks Dmitry.

Jiri, I have pushed this in for-4.20/upstream-fixes.

I think the branch has enough now to justify a PR towards Linus.
I believe https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10693337/ would be a good
material too, but OTOH, this only happens when the device fails at
probing, so maybe not so urgent.

Cheers,
Benjamin


> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry