lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181207144157.GB20201@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 15:41:57 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     mike.kravetz@...cle.com, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/101] 4.9.144-stable review

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 02:40:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 20:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.144 release.
> > There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat Dec  8 14:29:43 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.144-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> > Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> >     hugetlbfs: check for pgoff value overflow
> >
> > Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> >     hugetlbfs: fix offset overflow in hugetlbfs mmap
> >
> > Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> >     mm/hugetlb.c: don't call region_abort if region_chg fails
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected on arm32 and i386.
> 
> truncate_above_4GB (2M: 32): FAIL mmap() offset 4GB: Invalid argument

Can this be tracked down to a commit in this tree that caused this
regression?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ