[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181207155627.GG1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:56:27 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc: fallback to first node if the wanted node
offline
On Fri 07-12-18 22:27:13, Pingfan Liu wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 1308f54..4dc497d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -754,18 +754,23 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> u16 *cpu_to_apicid = early_per_cpu_ptr(x86_cpu_to_apicid);
> + int node, nr;
>
> BUG_ON(cpu_to_apicid == NULL);
> + nr = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
> +
> + /* bring up all possible node, since dev->numa_node */
> + //should check acpi works for node possible,
> + for_each_node(node)
> + if (!node_online(node))
> + init_memory_less_node(node);
I suspect there is no change if you replace for_each_node by
for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map)
here. If that is the case then we are probably calling
free_area_init_node too early. I do not see it yet though.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists