[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2To65m5fXwbVEBqYHzReKC2XiXx361rbUbLR1Bp+=+5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:41:33 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] sh: dreamcast: rtc: push down rtc class ops into driver
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:45 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 02:48:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The dreamcast RTC support has an extra level of indirection to
> > provide either the old read_persistent_clock/update_persistent_clock
> > interface or the rtc-generic device for hctosys/systohc.
>
> s/dreamcast/sh/ in the above sentence? Also repeated in the other
> patches.
Right, I guess this is at least ambiguous. What I was trying to express
here is that I'm taking the indirection out for dreamcast specifically.
In the other patches, I obviously copied it wrong. Fixed now in my
branch, thanks for the review!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists