[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181207170519.GA26857@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:05:19 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: hch@....de, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Refactor dummy DMA ops
So I'd really prefer if we had a separate dummy.c file, like in
my take on your previous patch here:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/e01adddc1733fa414dc16cd22e8f58be9b64a025
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/commitdiff/596bde76e5944a3f4beb8c2769067ca88dda127a
Otherwise this looks fine. If you don't minde I'll take your patches,
apply the move to a separate file and merge it into the above tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists