linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kprobes: x86_64: blacklist non-attachable interrupt functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:58:05 +0100
From:   Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: x86_64: blacklist non-attachable interrupt
 functions

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 01:01:20AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Andrea and Ingo,
> 
> Here is the patch what I meant. I just ran it on qemu-x86, and seemed working.
> After introducing this patch, I will start adding arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist()
> to some arches.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> [RFC] kprobes: x86/kprobes: Blacklist symbols in arch-defined prohibited area
> 
> From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> 
> Blacklist symbols in arch-defined probe-prohibited areas.
> With this change, user can see all symbols which are prohibited
> to probe in debugfs.
> 
> All archtectures which have custom prohibit areas should define
> its own arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist() function, but unless that,
> all symbols marked __kprobes are blacklisted.

What about iterating all symbols and use arch_within_kprobe_blacklist()
to check if we need to blacklist them or not.

In this way we don't have to introduce an
arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist() for each architecture.

Something like the following maybe.

Thanks.

[RFC] kprobes: blacklist all symbols in arch-defined prohibited area

From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>

Blacklist symbols in arch-defined probe-prohibited areas.
With this change, user can see all symbols which are prohibited
to probe in debugfs.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 90e98e233647..e67598dd7468 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -2093,6 +2093,35 @@ void dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(dump_kprobe);
 
+static int kprobe_blacklist_add(unsigned long entry)
+{
+	struct kprobe_blacklist_entry *ent;
+	unsigned long offset = 0, size = 0;
+
+	if (!kernel_text_address(entry) ||
+	    !kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(entry, &size, &offset))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ent = kmalloc(sizeof(*ent), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ent)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	ent->start_addr = entry;
+	ent->end_addr = entry + size;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ent->list);
+	list_add_tail(&ent->list, &kprobe_blacklist);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void *data, const char *name,
+					  struct module *mod,
+					  unsigned long entry)
+{
+	if (arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(entry))
+		kprobe_blacklist_add(entry);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Lookup and populate the kprobe_blacklist.
  *
@@ -2104,24 +2133,22 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(dump_kprobe);
 static int __init populate_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long *start,
 					     unsigned long *end)
 {
-	unsigned long *iter;
-	struct kprobe_blacklist_entry *ent;
-	unsigned long entry, offset = 0, size = 0;
+	unsigned long entry, *iter;
+	int ret;
 
+	/* Blacklist all arch_within_kprobe_blacklist() symbols */
+        mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
+	kallsyms_on_each_symbol(arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist, NULL);
+        mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+
+	/* Add explicitly blacklisted symbols */
 	for (iter = start; iter < end; iter++) {
 		entry = arch_deref_entry_point((void *)*iter);
-
-		if (!kernel_text_address(entry) ||
-		    !kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(entry, &size, &offset))
+		ret = kprobe_blacklist_add(entry);
+		if (ret == -EINVAL)
 			continue;
-
-		ent = kmalloc(sizeof(*ent), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!ent)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		ent->start_addr = entry;
-		ent->end_addr = entry + size;
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ent->list);
-		list_add_tail(&ent->list, &kprobe_blacklist);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }