[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181208134728.GC29772@dpdk-tbie>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 21:47:29 +0800
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, wexu@...hat.com,
jfreimann@...hat.com, maxime.coquelin@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] virtio_ring: use new vring flags
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:10:48PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:48:42PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > Switch to using the _SPLIT_ and _PACKED_ variants of vring flags
> > in split ring and packed ring respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
> > ---
> > @@ -502,7 +505,8 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > }
> > }
> > /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> > - desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> > + desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > + (u16)~BIT(VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT));
> >
> > if (indirect) {
> > /* Now that the indirect table is filled in, map it. */
>
> I kind of dislike it that this forces use of a cast here.
> Kind of makes it more fragile. Let's use a temporary instead?
I tried something like this:
u16 mask = ~BIT(VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT);
And it will still cause the warning:
warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
u16 mask = ~BIT(VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT);
If the cast isn't wanted, maybe use ~(1 << VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT)
directly?
>
> > --
> > 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists