[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181208164825.GA26154@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:48:25 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <john.hubbard@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
tom@...pey.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, benve@...co.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
rcampbell@...dia.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:33:53AM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Patchset to use HMM inside nouveau have already been posted, some
> of the bits have already made upstream and more are line up for
> next merge window.
Even with that it is a relative fringe feature compared to making
something like get_user_pages() that is literally used every to actually
work properly.
So I think we need to kick out HMM here and just find another place for
it to store data.
And just to make clear that I'm not picking just on this - the same is
true to a just a little smaller extent for the pgmap..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists