[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181208181258.GA13075@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 10:12:58 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <john.hubbard@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
tom@...pey.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, benve@...co.com,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
rcampbell@...dia.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 10:09:26AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Another fix that may put pressure 'struct page' is resolving the
> untenable situation of dax being incompatible with reflink, i.e.
> reflink currently requires page-cache pages. Dave has talked about
> silently establishing page-cache entries when a dax-page is cow'd for
> reflink, but I wonder if we could go the other way and introduce the
> mechanism of a page belonging to multiple mappings simultaneously and
> managed by the filesystem.
FYI, I had a a prototype for DAX + reflink that didn't require
the page cache, although it badly reimplemented parts of it. But
that was a long time ago, before we started requiring struct page
for the DAX memory.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists