[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-13731457-9a18-4add-983c-decbae526c81@palmer-si-x1c4>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 12:25:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To: anup@...infault.org
CC: atish.patra@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dmitriy@...-tech.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, Damien.LeMoal@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] RISC-V: Fix non-smp kernel boot on SMP systems
On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:20:57 PST (-0800), anup@...infault.org wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec, 2018, 10:30 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:57:31 PST (-0800), atish.patra@....com wrote:
>> > Currently, clocksource registration happens for an invalid cpu
>> > for non-smp kernels. This lead to kernel panic as cpu hotplug
>> > registration will fail for those cpus.
>> >
>> > Do not proceed if hartid is invalid. Take this opprtunity to
>> > print appropriate error strings for different failure cases.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>> b/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>> > index 39de6e49..4af4af47 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/riscv_timer.c
>> > @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct
>> device_node *n)
>> > int cpuid, hartid, error;
>> >
>> > hartid = riscv_of_processor_hartid(n);
>> > + if (hartid < 0)
>> > + return hartid;
>>
>> This seems like it's just hiding a bug somewhere else. We should at least
>> put
>> out a WARN here, as I'm not sure the error will propagate anywhere useful.
>>
>
> We need separate DT node for riscv_timer. The riscv_timer is nothing but
> SOC timer accessed via rdtime and SBI calls. It can be viewed as one
> device. In fact, this is how it's done in ARM/ARM64.
We had that at some point, but this was changed. The logic was that, since the
RISC-V ISA mandates the presence of this timer for all harts, the RISC-V CPU
node is sufficient to encode the presence of a RISC-V timer.
I'm OK changing this, but you should look at the old thread (which I can't
find) to make sure all the arguments are taken into account.
>> > cpuid = riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(hartid);
>> >
>> > if (cpuid != smp_processor_id())
>> > @@ -115,14 +117,19 @@ static int __init riscv_timer_init_dt(struct
>> device_node *n)
>> >
>> > /* This should be called only for boot cpu */
>> > riscv_timebase = riscv_timebase_frequency(n);
>> > - clocksource_register_hz(&riscv_clocksource, riscv_timebase);
>> > + error = clocksource_register_hz(&riscv_clocksource,
>> riscv_timebase);
>> >
>> > + if (error) {
>> > + pr_err("RISCV timer register failed [%d] for cpu = [%d]\n",
>> > + error, cpuid);
>> > + return error;
>> > + }
>> > error = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_RISCV_TIMER_STARTING,
>> > "clockevents/riscv/timer:starting",
>> > riscv_timer_starting_cpu, riscv_timer_dying_cpu);
>> > if (error)
>> > - pr_err("RISCV timer register failed [%d] for cpu = [%d]\n",
>> > - error, cpuid);
>> > + pr_err("cpu hp setup state failed for RISCV timer [%d]\n",
>> > + error);
>> > return error;
>> > }
>>
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists