[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181209150142.9010-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:01:42 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/platform/olpc: remove duplicated check on node == -1
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently the node == -1 check is being performed twice, the
second check is redundant and can be removed. Fix this by
removing the redundant second check and moving the first check
into a combined check with the result from the olpc_ofw call.
Detected by cppcheck:
Identical condition '(s32)node==-1', second condition is always false
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
index b4ab779f1d47..658363ec3ff3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
@@ -28,10 +28,7 @@ static phandle __init olpc_dt_getsibling(phandle node)
const void *args[] = { (void *)node };
void *res[] = { &node };
- if ((s32)node == -1)
- return 0;
-
- if (olpc_ofw("peer", args, res) || (s32)node == -1)
+ if (((s32)node == -1) || olpc_ofw("peer", args, res))
return 0;
return node;
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists