[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181209162007.GA22432@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:20:07 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Jespersen <laumann.thomas@...il.com>
Cc: gaoxiang25@...wei.com, yuchao0@...wei.com,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: Add braces to do-while statements
On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Thomas Jespersen wrote:
> This fixes warning reported by sparse (with -Wsparse-all).
Why is sparse warning about this?
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Jespersen <laumann.thomas@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/erofs/internal.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/internal.h b/drivers/staging/erofs/internal.h
> index 57575c7f5635..bf180a803446 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ static inline bool erofs_workgroup_get(struct erofs_workgroup *grp, int *ocnt)
> /* spin if it is temporarily locked at the reclaim path */
> if (unlikely(o == locked)) {
> #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
> - do
> + do {
> cpu_relax();
> - while (atomic_read(&grp->refcount) == locked);
> + } while (atomic_read(&grp->refcount) == locked);
That looks like valid code to me, why change this?
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists