[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49bb60b8-a51b-a4e8-da29-52f0a951c37b@denx.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 20:26:40 +0100
From: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn@...x.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: marc.zyngier@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
mark.rutland@....com, afaerber@...e.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com,
mp-cs@...ions-semi.com, linux@...ietech.com,
edgar.righi@...tec.org.br, laisa.costa@...tec.org.br,
guilherme.simoes@...tec.org.br, mkzuffo@....usp.br,
Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>, pn@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Actions
external interrupt controller
Hello Rob,
On 12/8/18 12:29 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:03:53AM +0100, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote:
>> Actions Semi OWL family SoC's provides support for external interrupt
>> controller to be connected and controlled using SIRQ pins. S500, S700
>> and S900 provides 3 SIRQ lines and works independently for 3 external
>> interrupt controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn@...x.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>
>> ---
>> .../interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b3adc4bddf40
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/actions,owl-sirq.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
>> +Actions Semi Owl SoCs SIRQ interrupt controller
>> +
>> +S500, S700 and S900 SoC's from Actions provides 3 SPI's from GIC,
>
> Listing SoCs here means you have to update this line for every new SoC.
Ok, I will mark it as OWL SoC's here.
>
>> +in which external interrupt controller can be connected. 3 SPI's
>> +45, 46, 47 from GIC are directly exposed as SIRQ. It has
>> +the following properties:
>> +
>> +- inputs three interrupt signal from external interrupt controller
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +
>> +- compatible: should be "actions,owl-sirq"
>
> SoC specific compatibles needed.
Ok, I will change this into "actions,s700-sirq"
>
>> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
>> + region.
>> +- interrupt-controller: identifies the node as an interrupt controller
>> +- #interrupt-cells: specifies the number of cells needed to encode an interrupt
>> + source, should be 2.
>> +- actions,sirq-shared-reg: Applicable for S500 and S700 where SIRQ register
>> + details are maintained at same offset/register.
>> +- actions,sirq-reg-offset: register offset for SIRQ interrupts. When registers are
>> + shared, all the three offsets will be same (S500 and S700).
>
> These properties should be implied by the compatible string.
Agreed for sirq-shared-reg.
But for s900 sirq-reg-offset, the register offset will have different values.
So this shall not be removed.
>
>> +- actions,ext-irq-range: Identifies external irq number range in different SoCs.
>
> Why is this needed? It appears to always be the same.
Yes, I agree for all the existing Owl SoC's this remains same.
In the previous version we defined this as constant in the code. But based on Marc's
feedback I understood that this value should come from Device Tree instead on hard
coding in the code.
>
>> +
>> +Example for S900:
>> +
>> +sirq: interrupt-controller@...b0000 {
>> + compatible = "actions,owl-sirq";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + actions,sirq-offset = <0x200 0x528 0x52c>;
>> + actions,ext-irq-range = <13 15>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +Example for S700:
>
> Examples are examples, not an enumeration of all possible dts entries.
> So 1 should be sufficient.
Sure, I will maintain only s700 here.
>
>> +
>> +sirq: interrupt-controller@...b0000 {
>> + compatible = "actions,owl-sirq";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + actions,sirq-shared-reg;
>> + actions,sirq-reg-offset = <0x200 0x200 0x200>;
>> + actions,ext-irq-range = <13 15>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +Example for S500:
>> +
>> +sirq: interrupt-controller@...b0000 {
>> + compatible = "actions,owl-sirq";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xb01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + actions,sirq-shared-reg;
>> + actions,sirq-offset = <0x200 0x200 0x200>;
>> + actions,ext-irq-range = <13 15>;
>> +};
>> --
>> 2.17.2
>>
>
--
Thanks,
Parthiban N
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-22 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: pn@...x.de
Powered by blists - more mailing lists