[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.474437376@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Anton Vorontsov" <anton@...msg.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelaf@...gle.com>,
"Colin Cross" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"nixiaoming" <nixiaoming@...wei.com>,
"Geliang Tang" <geliangtang@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 281/328] pstore/ram: Fix failure-path memory leak in
ramoops_init
3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
commit bac6f6cda206ad7cbe0c73c35e494377ce9c4749 upstream.
As reported by nixiaoming, with some minor clarifications:
1) memory leak in ramoops_register_dummy():
dummy_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dummy_data), GFP_KERNEL);
but no kfree() if platform_device_register_data() fails.
2) memory leak in ramoops_init():
Missing platform_device_unregister(dummy) and kfree(dummy_data)
if platform_driver_register(&ramoops_driver) fails.
I've clarified the purpose of ramoops_register_dummy(), and added a
common cleanup routine for all three failure paths to call.
Reported-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/pstore/ram.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
@@ -557,8 +557,22 @@ static struct platform_driver ramoops_dr
},
};
-static void ramoops_register_dummy(void)
+static inline void ramoops_unregister_dummy(void)
{
+ platform_device_unregister(dummy);
+ dummy = NULL;
+
+ kfree(dummy_data);
+ dummy_data = NULL;
+}
+
+static void __init ramoops_register_dummy(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Prepare a dummy platform data structure to carry the module
+ * parameters. If mem_size isn't set, then there are no module
+ * parameters, and we can skip this.
+ */
if (!mem_size)
return;
@@ -588,21 +602,28 @@ static void ramoops_register_dummy(void)
if (IS_ERR(dummy)) {
pr_info("could not create platform device: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(dummy));
+ dummy = NULL;
+ ramoops_unregister_dummy();
}
}
static int __init ramoops_init(void)
{
+ int ret;
+
ramoops_register_dummy();
- return platform_driver_register(&ramoops_driver);
+ ret = platform_driver_register(&ramoops_driver);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ ramoops_unregister_dummy();
+
+ return ret;
}
postcore_initcall(ramoops_init);
static void __exit ramoops_exit(void)
{
platform_driver_unregister(&ramoops_driver);
- platform_device_unregister(dummy);
- kfree(dummy_data);
+ ramoops_unregister_dummy();
}
module_exit(ramoops_exit);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists