lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.295324371@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 071/328] fuse: don't wake up reserved req in
 fuse_conn_kill()

3.16.62-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>

commit 0c4dd4ba1426c599072511dcf95a15ee5e12725b upstream.

Waking up reserved_req_waitq from fuse_conn_kill() doesn't make sense since
we aren't chaging ff->reserved_req here, which is what this waitqueue
signals.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/fuse/inode.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -387,7 +387,6 @@ void fuse_conn_kill(struct fuse_conn *fc
 	kill_fasync(&fc->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 	wake_up_all(&fc->waitq);
 	wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
-	wake_up_all(&fc->reserved_req_waitq);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_conn_kill);
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ