[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.35953941@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 074/328] fuse: Don't access pipe->buffers without
pipe_lock()
3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
commit a2477b0e67c52f4364a47c3ad70902bc2a61bd4c upstream.
fuse_dev_splice_write() reads pipe->buffers to determine the size of
'bufs' array before taking the pipe_lock(). This is not safe as
another thread might change the 'pipe->buffers' between the allocation
and taking the pipe_lock(). So we end up with too small 'bufs' array.
Move the bufs allocations inside pipe_lock()/pipe_unlock() to fix this.
Fixes: dd3bb14f44a6 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1913,11 +1913,14 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_write(str
if (!fc)
return -EPERM;
+ pipe_lock(pipe);
+
bufs = kmalloc(pipe->buffers * sizeof(struct pipe_buffer), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bufs)
+ if (!bufs) {
+ pipe_unlock(pipe);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
- pipe_lock(pipe);
nbuf = 0;
rem = 0;
for (idx = 0; idx < pipe->nrbufs && rem < len; idx++)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists