[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.420597284@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...e.de>,
"Arjan Van De Ven" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 177/328] x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode
revision before updating sibling threads
3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
commit c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed upstream.
After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other
thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode
resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads.
Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode
update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly
expensive operation.
[ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- s/mc->/mc_intel->/
- Return 0 in this case
- Adjust filename, context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -155,6 +155,18 @@ int apply_microcode(int cpu)
if (get_matching_mc(mc_intel, cpu) == 0)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
+ * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
+ * already.
+ */
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev >= mc_intel->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ c->microcode = rev;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
(unsigned long) mc_intel->bits,
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
@@ -653,6 +653,17 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct
if (mc_intel == NULL)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
+ * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
+ * already.
+ */
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev >= mc_intel->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
(unsigned long) mc_intel->bits,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists