[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.178910632@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Richard Weinberger" <richard@....at>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 138/328] ubifs: Fix synced_i_size calculation for
xattr inodes
3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
commit 59965593205fa4044850d35ee3557cf0b7edcd14 upstream.
In ubifs_jnl_update() we sync parent and child inodes to the flash,
in case of xattrs, the parent inode (AKA host inode) has a non-zero
data_len. Therefore we need to adjust synced_i_size too.
This issue was reported by ubifs self tests unter a xattr related work
load.
UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1896): dbg_check_synced_i_size: ui_size is 4, synced_i_size is 0, but inode is clean
UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1896): dbg_check_synced_i_size: i_ino 65, i_mode 0x81a4, i_size 4
Fixes: 1e51764a3c2a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: s/host_ui/dir_ui/]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/ubifs/journal.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ubifs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/journal.c
@@ -657,6 +657,11 @@ int ubifs_jnl_update(struct ubifs_info *
spin_lock(&ui->ui_lock);
ui->synced_i_size = ui->ui_size;
spin_unlock(&ui->ui_lock);
+ if (xent) {
+ spin_lock(&dir_ui->ui_lock);
+ dir_ui->synced_i_size = dir_ui->ui_size;
+ spin_unlock(&dir_ui->ui_lock);
+ }
mark_inode_clean(c, ui);
mark_inode_clean(c, dir_ui);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists