linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 287/328] perf/core: Protect PMU device removal with a 'pmu_bus_running' check, to fix CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.479312128@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "CAI Qian" <caiqian@...hat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Kan Liang" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
        "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>,
        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 287/328] perf/core: Protect PMU device removal with a
 'pmu_bus_running' check, to fix CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y kernel
 panic

3.16.62-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>

commit 0933840acf7b65d6d30a5b6089d882afea57aca3 upstream.

CAI Qian reported a crash in the PMU uncore device removal code,
enabled by the CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y option:

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147688837328451

The reason for the crash is that perf_pmu_unregister() tries to remove
a PMU device which is not added at this point. We add PMU devices
only after pmu_bus is registered, which happens in the
perf_event_sysfs_init() call and sets the 'pmu_bus_running' flag.

The fix is to get the 'pmu_bus_running' flag state at the point
the PMU is taken out of the PMU list and remove the device
later only if it's set.

Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Tested-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161020111011.GA13361@krava
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: no address filter attributes to clean up]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6930,7 +6930,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_register);
 
 void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
+	int remove_device;
+
 	mutex_lock(&pmus_lock);
+	remove_device = pmu_bus_running;
 	list_del_rcu(&pmu->entry);
 	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
 
@@ -6944,8 +6947,10 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu
 	free_percpu(pmu->pmu_disable_count);
 	if (pmu->type >= PERF_TYPE_MAX)
 		idr_remove(&pmu_idr, pmu->type);
-	device_del(pmu->dev);
-	put_device(pmu->dev);
+	if (remove_device) {
+		device_del(pmu->dev);
+		put_device(pmu->dev);
+	}
 	free_pmu_context(pmu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_unregister);