[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.99407835@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...riel.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 159/328] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table()
non-concurrent condition
3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit a6f572084fbee8b30f91465f4a085d7a90901c57 upstream.
Will noted that only checking mm_users is incorrect; we should also
check mm_count in order to cover CPUs that have a lazy reference to
this mm (and could do speculative TLB operations).
If removing this turns out to be a performance issue, we can
re-instate a more complete check, but in tlb_table_flush() eliding the
call_rcu_sched().
Fixes: 267239116987 ("mm, powerpc: move the RCU page-table freeing into generic code")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
mm/memory.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -359,15 +359,6 @@ void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather
tlb->need_flush = 1;
- /*
- * When there's less then two users of this mm there cannot be a
- * concurrent page-table walk.
- */
- if (atomic_read(&tlb->mm->mm_users) < 2) {
- __tlb_remove_table(table);
- return;
- }
-
if (*batch == NULL) {
*batch = (struct mmu_table_batch *)__get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (*batch == NULL) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists