[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1544392233.855606926@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Wen Xu" <wen.xu@...ech.edu>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 163/328] ext4: check to make sure the rename(2)'s
destination is not freed
3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit b50282f3241acee880514212d88b6049fb5039c8 upstream.
If the destination of the rename(2) system call exists, the inode's
link count (i_nlinks) must be non-zero. If it is, the inode can end
up on the orphan list prematurely, leading to all sorts of hilarity,
including a use-after-free.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200931
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Reported-by: Wen Xu <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- Return -EIO on error
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/ext4/namei.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -3211,6 +3211,12 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old
int force_reread;
int retval;
+ if (new.inode && new.inode->i_nlink == 0) {
+ EXT4_ERROR_INODE(new.inode,
+ "target of rename is already freed");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
dquot_initialize(old.dir);
dquot_initialize(new.dir);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists