linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 09 Dec 2018 16:27:11 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     andrew@...n.ch
Cc:     sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next
 tree

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:11:39 +0100

> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:00:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Commits
>> 
>>   dc9d38cec71c ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add phy_ignore_ta_mask to platform data")
>>   04fa26bab06d ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add platform_data support for phy_mask")
>> 
>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their author.
> 
> Hi David.
> 
> Any idea what happened here? The version in my git repo has SOB.
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1009811/ also has my SOB.

I wonder if "git am" ate it. :-/

Yeah it's the '--' I think.