[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34883ba5-b444-3d37-4d40-9b0a651dd2eb@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:05:44 -0800
From: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] swiotlb: add debugfs to track swiotlb buffer usage
On 12/10/18 12:00 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
>> @@ -528,6 +538,9 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> dev_warn(hwdev, "swiotlb buffer is full (sz: %zd bytes)\n", size);
>> return SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR;
>> found:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>> + io_tlb_used += nslots;
>> +#endif
> One nit I have about this patch is there are too many CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
>
> For example here, instead of io_tlb_used, we can have a macro defined,
> perhaps something like inc_iotlb_used(nslots). It can be placed in the
> same section that swiotlb_create_debugfs is defined so there's a single
> place where all the CONFIG_DEBUG_FS stuff is located.
>
> Then define inc_iotlb_used to be null when we don't have
> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
>
Dongli had removed above ifdef/endif on his next patch, "[PATCH v2 2/2]
swiotlb: checking whether swiotlb buffer is full with io_tlb_used"
Thanks,
Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists