[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210213150.GA18226@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:31:50 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] asm-generic/ptrace.h: add a comment about frame_pointer
I have been misled by comments in asm-generic/ptrace.h into thinking
that frame_pointer() is universally available across architectures,
which resulted in a wrong design decision.
Add a comment about frame_pointer in a hope that it will help others
to avoid this mistake in the future.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
---
include/asm-generic/ptrace.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h b/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
index 82e674f6b337..3186c30bd50d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/ptrace.h
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ static inline void user_stack_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
#define SET_FP(regs, val) (GET_FP(regs) = (val))
#endif
+/*
+ * Unlike instruction_pointer and user_stack_pointer,
+ * frame_pointer is not universally available across architectures.
+ */
static inline unsigned long frame_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return GET_FP(regs);
--
ldv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists