linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181210051338.GA2737@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:13:39 -0500
From:   Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the
 block tree

On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 10:55pm -0500,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:

> On 12/9/18 8:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It appears that there are a series of shared patches between the block
> > and device-mapper trees that are not the same commits.  I assume that the
> > block tree has been rebased, while the device mapper tree that was based
> > (or includes) part of the block tree has not bee rebased (yet).
> 
> Yep that's my fault, due to a stupid mistake I had to rebase the
> block tree. Didn't realize that Mike's tree was based on it. Mike,
> would it be a big issue for you to rebase the dm tree?

No problem, just did it and pushed to linux-dm.git's for-next.
(I was already anticipating rebasing dm's for-next again once the
bio-based percpu in_flight was merged into linux-block, hopefully we can
get that to land)