linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] input: keyboard: remove duplicated include from mtk-pmic-keys.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181210100729.GX26661@dell>
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:07:29 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        chen.zhong@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] input: keyboard: remove duplicated include from
 mtk-pmic-keys.c

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, YueHaibing wrote:

> On 2018/12/10 14:15, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Dec 2018, YueHaibing wrote:
> > 
> >> Remove duplicated include.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c | 1 -
> >>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c
> >> index 02c67a1..5027ebb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/mtk-pmic-keys.c
> >> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> >>  #include <linux/input.h>
> >>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>  #include <linux/of.h>
> >>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > 
> > You are removing the wrong one.
> 
> No, linux/kernel.h is a duplicated include indeed.

Actually both are not correct, but the first instance (at the top) is
even more incorrect.

> > Please convert this patch's main intent to alphabetise the header
> > files.  Then you can remove any obvious duplicates.
> 
> I can alphabetize it in v2 if need be.

Yes please.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog