[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210103029.GA29145@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:30:29 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
"sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: force ignore_loglevel before panic
On (12/10/18 18:58), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && !ignore_loglevel)
> >>>> + ignore_loglevel = true;
> >>>
> >>> console_verbose()?
> >>
> >> Thanks Sergey, it is really my need. I will prepare for a new version of patch:)
> >
> > Let's wait for people to take a look at this patch first.
> Shouldn't console_verbose() be called like
>
> + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic)
> + console_verbose();
Sure, that was what I meant. IOW console_verbose() instead of
`ignore_loglevel = true' assignment.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists