lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210123809.5ade45c4@bbrezillon>
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:38:09 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
        Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
        Victor Wan <victor.wan@...ogic.com>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic
 NAND flash controller

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:23:46 +0800
Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com> wrote:

> >> +			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> >> +			continue;
> >> +		}
> >> +		mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += ECC_ERR_CNT(*info);
> >> +		bitflips = max_t(u32, bitflips, ECC_ERR_CNT(*info));
> >> +	}  
> > 
> > Are you sure you handle correctly empty pages with bf?
> >   
> if scramble is enable, i would say yes here.
> when scramble is disabled, i am considering how to use the helper 
> nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk, but it seems that i can't get the ecc
> bytes which is caculated by ecc engine.by the way, nfc dma doesn't send 
> out the ecc parity bytes.

Even if the ECC engine is disabled?

> so i would suggest using scramble.
> 

No, please don't force people to use the scrambler.

> >> +
> >> +const void *
> >> +meson_nand_op_get_dma_safe_output_buf(const struct nand_op_instr *instr)
> >> +{
> >> +	if (WARN_ON(instr->type != NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR))
> >> +		return NULL;
> >> +
> >> +	if (virt_addr_valid(instr->ctx.data.buf.out) &&
> >> +	    !object_is_on_stack(instr->ctx.data.buf.out))  
> > 
> > Can you please create helpers for that? I guess it will help removing
> > these checks once the core will have a DMA-safe approach.
> >   
> I will use below definition:
> #define BUFFER_IS_DMA_SAFE(x)	\
> 	(virt_addr_valid((x)) && (!object_is_on_stack((x))))
> 
> Is it ok?

Please define a function, not a macro.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ