linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181210130525.2586bfac@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:05:25 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     sd@...asysnail.net, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next
 tree

Hi Dave,

On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 16:54:43 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:48:48 +1100
> 
> > That is fine as a last resort, but it is probably less disruptive to
> > find these things before you try to push i.e. as part of the "apply the
> > patch" otherwise you could end up having to rebase a whole lot of later
> > commits.  
> 
> I meant to imply that we should do both, something I do pre-commit
> and something that double checks again when I push.
> 
> Sorry if I wasn't clear.

No worries, belts and braces :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped