[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210124724.iuver2va3yjdsokf@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:47:24 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: syzbot <syzbot+592df0494801b6648ec6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: INFO: rcu detected stall in xfrm_hash_rebuild
syzbot <syzbot+592df0494801b6648ec6@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following crash on:
[..]
> Workqueue: events xfrm_hash_rebuild
Ignoring this report for a second -- I think it makes sense to see
if we can just remove the entire hash table rebuild/resize code.
After recent tree conversion, we could probably make the exact policies
part of the 'inexact tree' (which would be renamed to 'policy tree' or
some such).
Special-casing the exact policies made a lot of sense when we had
a single list for the inexact policies (to keep its length down).
But now I think we could try to unify all of this and only maintain
the existing tree-based storage.
Would also remove the need to do lookups in two different
data structures (bydst-hash-then-inexact-tree).
What do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists