linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181210132806.GA4177@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:28:07 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with
 a tracehook call

On 12/07, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
> Please make either v5 or v6 edition of this fix, or any similar fix,
> into v4.20.

IIUC, v5 above means

	[PATCH v5 23/25] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a tracehook call

you sent in another series...

>  long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +	struct thread_info *ti;
> +	u32 cached_flags;
> +
>  	user_exit();
>  
> -	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> -		ptrace_report_syscall(regs);
> -		/*
> -		 * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution. We want to
> -		 * avoid clobbering any register also, thus, not 'gotoing'
> -		 * skip label.
> -		 */
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> +	ti = current_thread_info();
> +	cached_flags = READ_ONCE(ti->flags) &
> +		       (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE |
> +			_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The tracer may decide to abort the syscall, if so tracehook
> -	 * will return !0. Note that the tracer may also just change
> -	 * regs->gpr[0] to an invalid syscall number, that is handled
> -	 * below on the exit path.
> -	 */
> -	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) &&
> -	    tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> -		goto skip;
> +	if (cached_flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) {
> +		int rc = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(cached_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * A nonzero return code from
> +			 * tracehook_report_syscall_entry() tells us
> +			 * to prevent the syscall execution, but
> +			 * we are not going to execute it anyway.
> +			 *
> +			 * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution.
> +			 * We want to avoid clobbering any register also,
> +			 * thus, not 'gotoing' skip label.
> +			 */
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (rc) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The tracer decided to abort the syscall.
> +			 * Note that the tracer may also just change
> +			 * regs->gpr[0] to an invalid syscall number,
> +			 * that is handled below on the exit path.
> +			 */
> +			goto skip;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Run seccomp after ptrace; allow it to set gpr[3]. */
>  	if (do_seccomp(regs))
> @@ -3293,7 +3309,7 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	if (regs->gpr[0] >= NR_syscalls)
>  		goto skip;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
> +	if (unlikely(cached_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))

I will leave this to maintainers, but to me this change looks good and imo it
also cleanups the code.

However I am not sure cached_flags should include _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT. If
nothing else, the caller can sleep in ptrace_stop() unpredictably long and
TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT can be set/cleared meanwhile.

Oleg.