[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210155057.38788656@xps13>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:50:57 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
Victor Wan <victor.wan@...ogic.com>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic
NAND flash controller
Hi Liang,
Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com> wrote on Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:12:39
+0800:
> On 2018/12/10 19:38, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:23:46 +0800
> > Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>> + mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> >>>> + continue;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += ECC_ERR_CNT(*info);
> >>>> + bitflips = max_t(u32, bitflips, ECC_ERR_CNT(*info));
> >>>> + }
> >>>
> >>> Are you sure you handle correctly empty pages with bf?
> >>> >> if scramble is enable, i would say yes here.
> >> when scramble is disabled, i am considering how to use the helper
> >> nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk, but it seems that i can't get the ecc
> >> bytes which is caculated by ecc engine.by the way, nfc dma doesn't send
> >> out the ecc parity bytes.
> >
> > Even if the ECC engine is disabled?
> >
> No.
> When ECC engine is disabled, it can read the ecc parity bytes ; but there is another problem that i need to consider how code struct looks better when reading error with ecc opened and then try to raw read.
> Is there a good idea?
When reading with ECC enabled, in case of uncorrectable error you
must re-read without ECC, then check if the page is empty or not with
the core helpers (nand_check_erased_*()).
Is this what you meant?
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists