[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32747ea1-7437-8055-a4f5-9f22378e57ae@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:48:25 -0200
From: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc.c: Fix zsmalloc 32-bit PAE support
On 12/10/18 1:15 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:21:05PM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>> index 84bd9bdc1987..d808cfde3d19 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>> @@ -64,8 +64,6 @@ extern unsigned int ptrs_per_p4d;
>> #define P4D_SIZE (_AC(1, UL) << P4D_SHIFT)
>> #define P4D_MASK (~(P4D_SIZE - 1))
>>
>> -#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS 52
>> -
>> #else /* CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL */
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -154,4 +152,6 @@ extern unsigned int ptrs_per_p4d;
>>
>> #define PGD_KERNEL_START ((PAGE_SIZE / 2) / sizeof(pgd_t))
>>
>> +#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS (pgtable_l5_enabled() ? 52 : 46)
>> +
>
> ...
>
>> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PGTABLE_64_DEFS_H */
>> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> index 0787d33b80d8..132c20b6fd4f 100644
>> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -116,6 +100,25 @@
>> */
>> #define OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG 1
>> #define OBJ_TAG_BITS 1
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS should be defined by all archs using zsmalloc:
>> + * Trying to guess it from MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, or considering it BITS_PER_LONG,
>> + * proved to be wrong by not considering PAE capabilities, or using SPARSEMEM
>> + * only headers, leading to bad object encoding due to object index overflow.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS
>> + #define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS BITS_PER_LONG
>> + #error "MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS HAS to be defined by arch using zsmalloc";
>> +#else
>> + #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
>> + #if (MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS >= (BITS_PER_LONG + PAGE_SHIFT - OBJ_TAG_BITS))
>> + #error "MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS is wrong for this arch";
>> + #endif
>> + #endif
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#define _PFN_BITS (MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT)
>> #define OBJ_INDEX_BITS (BITS_PER_LONG - _PFN_BITS - OBJ_TAG_BITS)
>> #define OBJ_INDEX_MASK ((_AC(1, UL) << OBJ_INDEX_BITS) - 1)
>
> Have you tested it with CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y?
>
> ASAICS, the patch makes OBJ_INDEX_BITS and what depends from it dynamic --
> it depends what paging mode we are booting in. ZS_SIZE_CLASSES depends
> indirectly on OBJ_INDEX_BITS and I don't see how struct zs_pool definition
> can compile with dynamic ZS_SIZE_CLASSES.
>
> Hm?
>
You're right, terribly sorry. This was a last time change.
mm/zsmalloc.c:256:21: error: variably modified ‘size_class’ at file scope
I'll revisit the patch. Any other comments are welcome.
Thank you
Powered by blists - more mailing lists