linux-kernel - Re: overlayfs access checks on underlying layers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSV4a949kvh8Tq1acXzRddW915naWiaG-yqVS1_JyqgEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:50:17 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     miklos@...redi.hu
Cc:     Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
        omosnace@...hat.com, bfields@...ldses.org, salyzyn@...roid.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: overlayfs access checks on underlying layers

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:39 AM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:32 PM Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Ok, I concede the point.  Not sure what that means though for v4.20.
>
> I have the revert queued up for v4.20 as that's the safest.

Miklos, when do you plan on sending the revert to Linus?  I just
tested v4.20-rc6 and the problem persists.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com