lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:21:59 -0500
From:   Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix iolat timestamp and restore accounting
 semantics

Hi Josef,

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:25:08PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:35:10AM -0500, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > The blk-iolatency controller measures the time from rq_qos_throttle() to
> > rq_qos_done_bio() and attributes this time to the first bio that needs
> > to create the request. This means if a bio is plug-mergeable or
> > bio-mergeable, it gets to bypass the blk-iolatency controller.
> > 
> > The recent series, to tag all bios w/ blkgs in [1] changed the timing
> > incorrectly as well. First, the iolatency controller was tagging bios
> > and using that information if it should process it in rq_qos_done_bio().
> > However, now that all bios are tagged, this caused the atomic_t for the
> > struct rq_wait inflight count to underflow resulting in a stall. Second,
> > now the timing was using the duration a bio from generic_make_request()
> > rather than the timing mentioned above.
> > 
> > This patch fixes the errors by accounting time separately in a bio
> > adding the field bi_start. If this field is set, the bio should be
> > processed by blk-iolatency in rq_qos_done_bio().
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181205171039.73066-1-dennis@kernel.org/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-iolatency.c     | 17 ++++++-----------
> >  include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> > index bee092727cad..52d5d7cc387c 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> > @@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_throttle(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
> >  	if (!blk_iolatency_enabled(blkiolat))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	bio->bi_start = ktime_get_ns();
> > +
> >  	while (blkg && blkg->parent) {
> >  		struct iolatency_grp *iolat = blkg_to_lat(blkg);
> >  		if (!iolat) {
> > @@ -480,18 +482,12 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_throttle(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void iolatency_record_time(struct iolatency_grp *iolat,
> > -				  struct bio_issue *issue, u64 now,
> > +				  struct bio *bio, u64 now,
> >  				  bool issue_as_root)
> >  {
> > -	u64 start = bio_issue_time(issue);
> > +	u64 start = bio->bi_start;
> >  	u64 req_time;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Have to do this so we are truncated to the correct time that our
> > -	 * issue is truncated to.
> > -	 */
> > -	now = __bio_issue_time(now);
> > -
> >  	if (now <= start)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > @@ -593,7 +589,7 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
> >  	bool enabled = false;
> >  
> >  	blkg = bio->bi_blkg;
> > -	if (!blkg)
> > +	if (!blkg || !bio->bi_start)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	iolat = blkg_to_lat(bio->bi_blkg);
> > @@ -612,8 +608,7 @@ static void blkcg_iolatency_done_bio(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct bio *bio)
> >  		atomic_dec(&rqw->inflight);
> >  		if (!enabled || iolat->min_lat_nsec == 0)
> >  			goto next;
> > -		iolatency_record_time(iolat, &bio->bi_issue, now,
> > -				      issue_as_root);
> > +		iolatency_record_time(iolat, bio, now, issue_as_root);
> >  		window_start = atomic64_read(&iolat->window_start);
> >  		if (now > window_start &&
> >  		    (now - window_start) >= iolat->cur_win_nsec) {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > index 46c005d601ac..c2c02ec08d7c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > @@ -181,6 +181,18 @@ struct bio {
> >  	 */
> >  	struct blkcg_gq		*bi_blkg;
> >  	struct bio_issue	bi_issue;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOLATENCY
> > +	/*
> > +	 * blk-iolatency measure the time a bio takes between rq_qos_throttle()
> > +	 * and rq_qos_done_bio().  It attributes the time to the bio that gets
> > +	 * the request allowing any bios that can tag along via plug merging or
> > +	 * bio merging to be free (from blk-iolatency's perspective). This is
> > +	 * different from the time a bio takes from generic_make_request() to
> > +	 * the end of its life.  So, this also serves as a marker for which bios
> > +	 * should be processed by blk-iolatency.
> > +	 */
> > +	u64			bi_start;
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOLATENCY */
> 
> So now we have bi_issue and bi_start, both count basically the same thing.  Does
> using bi_issue actually matter?  I assume that it's going to be basically the
> same as bi_start for the most part, you are just getting us to only care about
> the bio's that we care about.
> 
> What if we just add a bio flag to indicate that we've gone through io-latency?
> Once that's in place do these problems go away?  Or is the extra time counted
> from make_request_time to rq_qos_throttle() actually matter?  I feel like it
> shouldn't since it's mostly just checks, but I could be mistaken.  Thanks,

Yeah after talking with Jens about this, it sounds like a good way
forward would be to reuse BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED. My initial concern with
the flag only approach was the time of stacked drivers. But as they
should not be calling into blk_mq_make_request(), tagging in that
function should allow us to properly ignore them.

It sounds like in the general case where a bio does make it to
blk_mq_make_request(), the overhead of the checks prior should be
minimal. I'll have a v2 out soon doing tagging with BIO_QUEUE_ENTERED.

Thanks,
Dennis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ