linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:52:43 -0800
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com
Cc:     ak@...ux.intel.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks



On 12/11/18 9:18 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/10/18 4:24 PM, Aubrey Li wrote:
>> The tracking turns on the usage flag at the next context switch of
>> the task, but requires 3 consecutive context switches with no usage
>> to clear it. This decay is required because well-written AVX-512
>> applications are expected to clear this state when not actively using
>> AVX-512 registers.
> 
> One concern about this:  Given a HZ=1000 system, this means that the
> flag needs to get scanned every ~3ms.  That's a pretty good amount of
> scanning on a system with hundreds or thousands of tasks running around.
> 
> How many tasks does this scale to until you're eating up an entire CPU
> or two just scanning /proc?
> 

The reason why I believe that an exponential decay average, or some
other kind of weighted decay of the AVX512 usage is better.

Tim