| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <922713302.5303567.1544554167994.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:49:27 +0100 (CET)
From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@...y.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Rick Macklem <rmacklem@...uelph.ca>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 051/118] flexfiles: use per-mirror specified
stateid for IO
Hi Greg,
Thanks for pushing this into sable as well. However, I think patch makes more sense
with 320f35b7bf8cccf1997ca3126843535e1b95e9c4
Tigran.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> To: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "stable" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "Tigran Mkrtchyan"
> <tigran.mkrtchyan@...y.de>, "Rick Macklem" <rmacklem@...uelph.ca>, "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
> "Sasha Levin" <sashal@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 4:41:10 PM
> Subject: [PATCH 4.19 051/118] flexfiles: use per-mirror specified stateid for IO
> 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> [ Upstream commit bb21ce0ad227b69ec0f83279297ee44232105d96 ]
>
> rfc8435 says:
>
> For tight coupling, ffds_stateid provides the stateid to be used by
> the client to access the file.
>
> However current implementation replaces per-mirror provided stateid with
> by open or lock stateid.
>
> Ensure that per-mirror stateid is used by ff_layout_write_prepare_v4 and
> nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@...y.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@...uelph.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.h | 4 ++++
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> index cae43333ef16..86ac2c5b93fe 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> @@ -1361,12 +1361,7 @@ static void ff_layout_read_prepare_v4(struct rpc_task
> *task, void *data)
> task))
> return;
>
> - if (ff_layout_read_prepare_common(task, hdr))
> - return;
> -
> - if (nfs4_set_rw_stateid(&hdr->args.stateid, hdr->args.context,
> - hdr->args.lock_context, FMODE_READ) == -EIO)
> - rpc_exit(task, -EIO); /* lost lock, terminate I/O */
> + ff_layout_read_prepare_common(task, hdr);
> }
>
> static void ff_layout_read_call_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
> @@ -1542,12 +1537,7 @@ static void ff_layout_write_prepare_v4(struct rpc_task
> *task, void *data)
> task))
> return;
>
> - if (ff_layout_write_prepare_common(task, hdr))
> - return;
> -
> - if (nfs4_set_rw_stateid(&hdr->args.stateid, hdr->args.context,
> - hdr->args.lock_context, FMODE_WRITE) == -EIO)
> - rpc_exit(task, -EIO); /* lost lock, terminate I/O */
> + ff_layout_write_prepare_common(task, hdr);
> }
>
> static void ff_layout_write_call_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
> @@ -1742,6 +1732,10 @@ ff_layout_read_pagelist(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
> fh = nfs4_ff_layout_select_ds_fh(lseg, idx);
> if (fh)
> hdr->args.fh = fh;
> +
> + if (!nfs4_ff_layout_select_ds_stateid(lseg, idx, &hdr->args.stateid))
> + goto out_failed;
> +
> /*
> * Note that if we ever decide to split across DSes,
> * then we may need to handle dense-like offsets.
> @@ -1804,6 +1798,9 @@ ff_layout_write_pagelist(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr, int
> sync)
> if (fh)
> hdr->args.fh = fh;
>
> + if (!nfs4_ff_layout_select_ds_stateid(lseg, idx, &hdr->args.stateid))
> + goto out_failed;
> +
> /*
> * Note that if we ever decide to split across DSes,
> * then we may need to handle dense-like offsets.
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.h
> b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.h
> index 411798346e48..de50a342d5a5 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.h
> @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@ unsigned int ff_layout_fetch_ds_ioerr(struct
> pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> unsigned int maxnum);
> struct nfs_fh *
> nfs4_ff_layout_select_ds_fh(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, u32 mirror_idx);
> +int
> +nfs4_ff_layout_select_ds_stateid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
> + u32 mirror_idx,
> + nfs4_stateid *stateid);
>
> struct nfs4_pnfs_ds *
> nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg, u32 ds_idx,
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> index 59aa04976331..a8df2f496898 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> @@ -370,6 +370,25 @@ out:
> return fh;
> }
>
> +int
> +nfs4_ff_layout_select_ds_stateid(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
> + u32 mirror_idx,
> + nfs4_stateid *stateid)
> +{
> + struct nfs4_ff_layout_mirror *mirror = FF_LAYOUT_COMP(lseg, mirror_idx);
> +
> + if (!ff_layout_mirror_valid(lseg, mirror, false)) {
> + pr_err_ratelimited("NFS: %s: No data server for mirror offset index %d\n",
> + __func__, mirror_idx);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + nfs4_stateid_copy(stateid, &mirror->stateid);
> + return 1;
> +out:
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds - prepare a DS connection for an RPC call
> * @lseg: the layout segment we're operating on
> --
> 2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists