[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <312e5c0c-e92f-a337-3730-2fd73c99f48a@electromag.com.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:02:00 +0800
From: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] iio: light: isl29018: add optional vdd/vdda
regulator operation support
On 11/12/2018 12:29 pm, Anson Huang wrote:
>> G'day Anson,
>>
>> Just pulled up the datasheet for this chip.
>>
>> The absolute max for Vdda is speced as Vddd ±0.5 With a note that Vdda
>> should be externally shorted to Vddd.
> The data sheet says vdda should be connected to vdd externally, then I think we should just
> use one regulator vdd, then it will be much easier for the driver, what do you think?
>
Yes I think that makes sense.
--
Regards
Phil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists