linux-kernel - [GIT PULL 01/21] lightnvm: pblk: ignore the smeta oob area scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181211191627.15542-2-mb@lightnvm.io>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:16:07 +0100
From:   Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
To:     axboe@...com
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhoujie Wu <zjwu@...vell.com>,
        Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
Subject: [GIT PULL 01/21] lightnvm: pblk: ignore the smeta oob area scan

From: Zhoujie Wu <zjwu@...vell.com>

The smeta area l2p mapping is empty, and actually the
recovery procedure only need to restore data sector's l2p
mapping. So ignore the smeta oob scan.

Signed-off-by: Zhoujie Wu <zjwu@...vell.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier González <javier@...igon.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...xlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
---
 drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c
index 5740b7509bd8..0fbd30e0a587 100644
--- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c
+++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c
@@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static int pblk_recov_scan_oob(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line *line,
 			       struct pblk_recov_alloc p)
 {
 	struct nvm_tgt_dev *dev = pblk->dev;
+	struct pblk_line_meta *lm = &pblk->lm;
 	struct nvm_geo *geo = &dev->geo;
 	struct ppa_addr *ppa_list;
 	struct pblk_sec_meta *meta_list;
@@ -342,12 +343,12 @@ static int pblk_recov_scan_oob(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line *line,
 	void *data;
 	dma_addr_t dma_ppa_list, dma_meta_list;
 	__le64 *lba_list;
-	u64 paddr = 0;
+	u64 paddr = pblk_line_smeta_start(pblk, line) + lm->smeta_sec;
 	bool padded = false;
 	int rq_ppas, rq_len;
 	int i, j;
 	int ret;
-	u64 left_ppas = pblk_sec_in_open_line(pblk, line);
+	u64 left_ppas = pblk_sec_in_open_line(pblk, line) - lm->smeta_sec;
 
 	if (pblk_line_wp_is_unbalanced(pblk, line))
 		pblk_warn(pblk, "recovering unbalanced line (%d)\n", line->id);
-- 
2.17.1