lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26201549.d0hG7Wm4ip@blindfold>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:28 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     bp@...e.de, bp@...en8.de,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        mingo@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, jdike@...toit.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/build] x86/um/vdso: Drop implicit common-page-size linker flag

Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018, 20:08:30 CET schrieb Nick Desaulniers:
> > But in this particular case, DKIM is pretty good spam protection
> > mechanism so enabling it is a good idea.
> 
> Internal Gmail developers were able to help me verify that SPF was
> setup correctly, but indeed there's no DKIM.  This article has more
> info: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en.  Richard, I
> don't know if that's a lot of work on your end, but other folks using
> gmail might have the same issue repeatedly with receiving emails from
> your domain otherwise.

Running your own mailserver is already a PITA, so adding a little more
pain does not count in much more.
Thanks for talking to Gmail guys, I'll look into adding DKIM.

Thanks,
//richard


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ