[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181211203652.rogajl4ajwu7cs6f@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:36:53 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: meson: add support for Meson G12A SoC i2c
controller
> I am okay if it is reasonable below in file
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a.dtsi. I2c controller node just uses
> axg's compatible.
>
> i2c0: i2c@...00 {
> compatible = "amlogic,meson-axg-i2c";
Actually, you should have
compatible = "amlogic,meson-g12a-i2c", "amlogic,meson-axg-i2c";
in the DT to have support for future SoC specific additions. And then,
patch 1 is needed.
Or do you handle this differently? I'd think this is DT standard.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists